Vascular Surgery OS
Start learning
← All domains
Clinical topic

Acute Limb Ischaemia

Acute limb ischaemia (ALI) is a sudden decrease in arterial perfusion threatening limb survival, with symptoms of less than 2 weeks. Management depends on Rutherford grade and cause. Give IV unfractionated heparin, analgesia, oxygen and fluids, then activate the ALI pathway with senior vascular decision-making. Grade I is usually conservative; IIa needs urgent imaging and planned revascularisation; IIb needs immediate revascularisation; III usually needs primary amputation or palliation.

Written September 23, 2026 · Mr Razhan K Ali

1 · UNDERSTAND — What is happening?

Definition and burden

ALI is sudden reduced limb perfusion with a potential threat to limb survival; symptoms are under 2 weeks. Longer duration is usually chronic limb ischaemia. ESVS cites Medicare data with in-hospital mortality 9.0%, one-year mortality about 41%, and one-year amputation 11.0%.

Causes

Native-artery ALI in Swedvasc: thrombosis 53%, embolism 44%, popliteal aneurysm 3%. Emboli are commonly associated with atrial fibrillation or ventricular thrombus. Other causes include graft/stent occlusion, dissection, trauma, vasculitis, popliteal entrapment, adventitial cystic disease, paradoxical embolism, thrombophilia, malignancy and low-output states.

Assessment

The 6 Ps are pain, pallor, pulselessness, poikilothermia/perishing cold, paraesthesia and paralysis, but they are rarely all present. Document Doppler signals, ABI, sensory and motor status, both limbs, abdominal/cardiac findings and frailty. Sensory loss means threatened limb; motor weakness means the limb is immediately threatened. Do not use admission CK or myoglobin alone to decide between revascularisation and primary amputation.

Rutherford ALI classification

GradeSensory lossMotor deficitPrognosis
I viableNoneNoneNo immediate threat
IIa marginally threatenedNone or minimalNoneSalvageable if promptly treated
IIb immediately threatenedMore than toesMild/moderateSalvageable if immediately revascularised
III irreversibleProfound, anaestheticProfound paralysisMajor tissue loss or permanent nerve damage inevitable

Imaging

Image if it does not delay treatment. CTA is the recommended first-line anatomical imaging modality. Duplex or contrast-enhanced MRA may be alternatives depending on availability. DSA remains diagnostic and therapeutic in the same sitting.

2 · DECIDE — What do I do next?

  1. Suspect ALI clinically: sudden limb pain, coldness, pulse loss, paraesthesia, weakness or acute-onset claudication within 2 weeks.
  2. Start immediate measures: IV unfractionated heparin, oxygen, analgesia, IV fluids, baseline bloods, ECG and careful documentation.
  3. Grade the limb using Rutherford: sensory loss, motor deficit and venous Doppler signal decide urgency.
  4. Grade I: viable / acute-onset claudication. Conservative management, best medical therapy and supervised exercise; do not thrombolyse.
  5. Grade IIa: marginally threatened. Image urgently, usually CTA, then choose CDT, thrombectomy, open surgery or hybrid treatment.
  6. Grade IIb: immediately threatened. Immediate revascularisation. Image only if it will not delay reperfusion.
  7. Grade III: irreversible. Primary amputation or palliation is usual; revascularise only if genuinely uncertain and very recent.

Core ESVS decisions

SituationESVS 2020 positionClass / Level
Grade ICDT not recommendedRec 23: III, B
Grade IIaCDT should be considered as an alternative to surgeryRec 24: I, A
Grade IIbUrgent revascularisation mandatory; CDT may be considered if started promptlyRec 25: IIb, B
Systemic IV thrombolysisNot recommendedRec 22: III, A
Aspiration / mechanical thrombectomyShould be consideredRec 33: IIa, C
Occluded bypass graftIdentify and treat the cause of graft occlusionRec 20: I, C

Special situations

Thrombosed popliteal aneurysm usually needs saphenous vein bypass; lysis may improve tibial run-off; stent graft is not first-line. Acute aortic occlusion needs urgent revascularisation and anaesthesia/ICU planning. NCEPOD 2025 identified pathway delays and recommends a national ALI guideline.

3 · JUSTIFY — Why is that the correct decision?

Mechanism → grade → time → treatment. Nerve and muscle die within hours. Sensory loss means threatened limb; motor weakness means time-critical reperfusion. Evidence does not support one universal first-line technique for every patient.

Surgery vs thrombolysis

  • Older RCTs and the 2018 Cochrane review do not show clear universal superiority of surgery or thrombolysis for limb salvage, amputation or death.
  • Thrombolysis carries more bleeding, haemorrhagic stroke and distal embolisation.
  • Surgery may restore flow faster in immediately threatened limbs but has operative and anaesthetic risk.
  • ESVS therefore separates management by Rutherford grade rather than declaring one universal technique.

Landmark evidence

EvidencePractical message
Rochester 1994Small RCT; limb salvage similar, survival appeared better with thrombolysis.
STILE 1994Included many patients with symptoms over 14 days; acute graft occlusion subgroup appeared to benefit from lysis.
TOPAS 1998Amputation-free survival similar; bleeding and intracranial haemorrhage higher with lysis.
Cochrane 2018No clear difference in limb salvage, amputation or death; thrombolysis had more major haemorrhage and distal embolisation.

Trial to know — ESTABLISH

ESTABLISH is a UK pragmatic multicentre RCT comparing open surgical versus endovascular strategy in lower-limb ALI. Primary outcome: amputation-free survival at 6 months. Registry: ISRCTN15236323.

4 · PERFORM — How is management executed?

  1. Senior vascular assessment: document Rutherford grade, Doppler findings, onset, sensory/motor status, frailty, ceiling of care and consent.
  2. Heparin: IV UFH 5000 IU or 70–100 IU/kg, then infusion adjusted by ACT or APTT. Use non-heparin anticoagulant if HIT is suspected.
  3. Supportive measures: oxygen, analgesia and IV rehydration.
  4. Grade and image: CTA first-line unless it will delay reperfusion in an immediately threatened limb.
  5. Open surgery: embolectomy may be done under local/regional anaesthesia with an anaesthetist present.
  6. Completion angiography: after open or endovascular revascularisation; treat residual inflow/outflow disease.
  7. CDT: ultrasound-guided access; rtPA or urokinase; no routine fibrinogen monitoring; no continuous systemic therapeutic heparinisation during lysis; stop for major bleeding.
  8. Consent: limb loss, death, bleeding, stroke/ICH with lysis, compartment syndrome/fasciotomy, reperfusion injury, renal failure, re-occlusion and further procedures.

5 · MANAGE — What happens next / what can go wrong?

Compartment syndrome

Diagnosis is clinical. Risk factors include ischaemia over 6 hours, young age, previous ALI, hypotension, raised CK, Rutherford IIb, inadequate backflow and positive fluid balance. Routine prophylactic fasciotomy is not recommended, but prophylactic four-compartment fasciotomy should be considered if ischaemia was profound or prolonged. Emergency fasciotomy should be within 2 hours of diagnosis and not delayed beyond 6 hours.

Other complications

ComplicationRecogniseAct
Reperfusion syndromeHyperkalaemia, acidosis, dark urine, high CKMonitor potassium, CK and urine output; fluids; renal support when needed
Bleeding during lysisAccess haematoma, major bleeding or ICHMajor bleeding: stop lysis.
Re-occlusionLoss of Doppler signal or recurrent symptomsRe-image and treat the culprit lesion, not just the clot.

After limb salvage

  • Embolic ALI: ECG, 24-hour monitoring, echocardiography and CTA of the whole aorta if no cardiac source; long-term anticoagulation if AF/intracardiac thrombus.
  • Thrombotic ALI or failed previous revascularisation: long-term antiplatelet or anticoagulant plus statin; stop smoking.
  • Under 60 with thrombotic ALI: consider malignancy and thrombophilia, especially with simultaneous venous thrombosis.

6 · REMEMBER — What must I retain?

  1. ALI = under 2 weeks; one-year mortality is about 40%.
  2. Start UFH 5000 IU or 70–100 IU/kg, oxygen, analgesia and IV fluids while grading the limb.
  3. Grade I: no sensory/motor loss → conservative; no lysis.
  4. Grade IIa: minimal/no sensory loss, no weakness → CTA and planned revascularisation; CDT is Class I A as an alternative.
  5. Grade IIb: sensory loss beyond toes or motor weakness → immediate revascularisation.
  6. Grade III: profound anaesthesia/paralysis, no venous signal → usually primary amputation or palliation.
  7. Lysis vs surgery: no universal winner; lysis bleeds more; surgery restores flow faster.
  8. Occlusion length: under 30 cm tends to favour surgery; over 30 cm tends to favour lysis.
  9. Fasciotomy: four compartments, within 2 hours of diagnosis, never delayed beyond 6 hours.
  10. Treat the cause: anticoagulate AF/intracardiac thrombus; statin plus antiplatelet or anticoagulant after thrombosis.

Memory hook: Can walk — wait. Can't feel — hurry. Can't move — open/endovascular now. Can't bend — let it go.

References

  1. Björck M, Earnshaw JJ, Acosta S, et al. Editor's Choice — European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Acute Limb Ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(2):173-218. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.09.006. PMID: 31899099.
  2. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26(3):517-538. doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70045-4. PMID: 9308598.
  3. Boyle JR, Atkins ER, Birmpili P, et al. A Best Practice Clinical Care Pathway for Peripheral Arterial Disease. J Vasc Soc GB Irel. 2022;1(Suppl 3):S1-S13. doi:10.54522/jvsgbi.2022.017.
  4. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. Risking Life and Limb: A review of the quality of care provided to adults with acute limb ischaemia. London: NCEPOD; 2025.
  5. Ouriel K, Shortell CK, DeWeese JA, et al. A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with operative revascularization in the initial treatment of acute peripheral arterial ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19(6):1021-1030. doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(94)70214-4. PMID: 8201703.
  6. The STILE Investigators. Results of a prospective randomized trial evaluating surgery versus thrombolysis for ischemia of the lower extremity. Ann Surg. 1994;220(3):251-266. doi:10.1097/00000658-199409000-00003.
  7. Ouriel K, Veith FJ, Sasahara AA; TOPAS Investigators. A comparison of recombinant urokinase with vascular surgery as initial treatment for acute arterial occlusion of the legs. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(16):1105-1111. doi:10.1056/NEJM199804163381603.
  8. Darwood R, Berridge DC, Kessel DO, Robertson I, Forster R. Surgery versus thrombolysis for initial management of acute limb ischaemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):CD002784. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002784.pub3. PMID: 30095170.
  9. Maldonado TS, Powell A, Wendorff H, et al. One-year limb salvage and quality of life following mechanical aspiration thrombectomy in patients with acute lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2024;80(4):1159-1168.e5. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.043. PMID: 38914349.
  10. ESTABLISH Trial. Endovascular strategy versus Surgical strategy for the Treatment for Acute Limb Ischaemia. ISRCTN15236323. doi:10.1186/ISRCTN15236323.